Trim Review and Shedding Question -- 2nd Post


Suzanne Mansolilli
 

Don' t know if this got overlooked or if my photos aren't good enough -- please just let me know if I need to have them re-taken.  Thanx!


---In EquineCushings@..., <suzannemansolilli@...> wrote :

Just wanting a little help with my trim, if someone could check the latest photos  I just posted.  I'm living out of the country right now, so am relying on my farrier to follow the original markups and trim guidelines that Linda did last fall.  New markups and comments would be wonderful. 


Also a question about shedding.  I hear from the barn owner that Monty is the only one of 26 horses that  is not shedding out.  His bloodwork results are posted in his CH (link below).  He was last tested for ACTH (32.5) by Cornell  in December 2014 after having been on 2mg Prascend since Oct 2014.  He is still on the same dosage, but is not shedding.  Is this normal or is it time for more blood work?


Thanks,


 SuzanneM and Monty

Western Colorado -- July, 2014

Case History:  https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/echistory8/files/SuzanneM & Monty/

Photos:  ECHistory8



Lavinia Fiscaletti
 

Hi Suzanne,

The trim had made a bit of progress with backing the toes but seems to have stalled. Heels are still run forward, toes need to come back even more and there are flares in the walls that would benefit from being beveled to help redirect the shearing forces on impact. The farrier is likely thinking that s/he has backed to the white line and can't go back any further - which isn't really true. The toe is probably at what USED to be the white line but the true WL is buried under run-forward, dead sole material so is distorting the landmarks. The lateral views are taken from a high angle and are hiding the rear of the foot in shadow so makes commenting on it difficult. The mark-ups Linda did are still quite valid. If you would like new ones, would need a few better lateral views posted. Check here for tips on getting the best pix:

https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/EquineCushings/conversations/messages/192509

The ACTH value for Dec would have me quite happy if this was one of my boys. Coat shedding may or may not return to its pre-PPID levels even when the pergolide dose is correct. It's one symptom of PPID when it becomes an issue initially but isn't a very good barometer of control after that. You could retest in late April/early May to see if the ACTH is solidly in the mid-range during the normal low ACTH time of year. You can also try adding chastetree berry to see if it will induce and maintain a more appropriate coat.

Lavinia, Dante, George Too and Peanut
Jan 05, RI
EC Support Team

>>>>>

Case History:  https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/echistory8/files/SuzanneM & Monty/

Photos:  ECHistory8



Suzanne Mansolilli
 

Hi Lavinia,

I've uploaded 5 new photos my farrier took after he trimmed this past Wed.  I have to say, I'm discouraged.  He decided to use Linda's original recommendations as a guideline for this trim instead of getting new photos analyzed.  I don't think it would have made any difference, though.  I sent detailed instruction on taking the post-trim photos, but to me they look like they're from all the wrong angles once again.  And I don't see that the bars, tip of frog or the heels were trimmed as per instructions, but maybe you'll see differently.   Also, difficult for me to tell from the sole shot if the length of the hoof has the correct proportions, as the photo angle looks skewed.  I'd appreciate your opinion, though.  I'm thinking it's time to look for a new farrier.  I'm afraid this one is trying, but just doesn't understand.  What do you think?

--------


---In EquineCushings@..., <shilohmom@...> wrote :

The trim had made a bit of progress with backing the toes but seems to have stalled. Heels are still run forward, toes need to come back even more and there are flares in the walls that would benefit from being beveled to help redirect the shearing forces on impact...The lateral views are taken from a high angle and are hiding the rear of the foot in shadow so makes commenting on it difficult. The mark-ups Linda did are still quite valid. If you would like new ones, would need a few better lateral views posted. 

-----------
>>>>>

Case History:  https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/echistory8/files/SuzanneM & Monty/

Photos:  ECHistory8